We use cookies to enhance your browsing experience, serve personalized ads or content, and analyze our traffic. By clicking "Accept All", you consent to our use of cookies.
Customize Consent Preferences
We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.
The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ...
Always Active
Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.
No cookies to display.
Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.
No cookies to display.
Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.
No cookies to display.
Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.
No cookies to display.
Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.
The Heritage Foundation has vowed to go to federal court to stop Democrats’ nomination of Vice President Kamala Harris. Silly political bluster, of course. But it’s another reminder of how important the Supreme Court has become as a politicized institution and an influencer of elections.
The Supreme Court is an anomalous institution. It combines vast power with minimal accountability. And trust in the Court has, rightfully, plunged to the lowest level ever recorded. Millions see it as hopelessly politicized. The Supreme Court is broken and urgently needs reform.
Court reform is an issue whose time has come. The Brennan Center has pursued changes for years, and we’re very pleased to report that our work will gather new intensity. Today we launched the Kohlberg Center on the U.S. Supreme Court, a major new initiative to concentrate our efforts. We’re establishing it thanks to the generosity of Jim Kohlberg, a businessman and philanthropist, who has pledged $30 million for a long-term investment in this work. It is a remarkable and farsighted commitment.
The opportunities to improve the Court are many. Congress should enact an 18-year term limit for justices. Nobody should have too much public power for too long. The public strongly supports term limits — according to a new poll from Fox News, 78 percent of registered voters are in favor. It has majority support among Democrats, Republicans, and independents. Few issues have such clear public consensus.
What we aim to do is give substantive depth to this support. Most states term limit their justices. How do those systems work? How about those in our peer democracies, all of which have term limits for their constitutional courts? These and many other questions can help build the growing bipartisan support for this reform. Term limits are an idea whose time has come.
Term limits are just a start. Last year, to deflect rising criticism, the Supreme Court adopted its first code of conduct. But it’s an unenforceable sham that the Court disingenuously said was only to clear up the public’s “misunderstanding.” There was never a misunderstanding. The justices have proved that they can’t police themselves — the public can see that — and that the Court needs clear and enforceable rules.
And there is a need for creative and innovative responses to the challenge of a Supreme Court that is far out of step with the American public. Often Congress has the power to respond to misguided rulings, but congressional procedures get in the way. In recent years there has been a streamlined response mechanism for Congress to undo regulations. Why not something like that so lawmakers can have a meaningful say? At the Kohlberg Center, those and other ideas will be incubated.
These reforms have wide backing from the public because they are not part of the partisan push and pull. They speak to a fundamental belief in the rule of law, commitment to the Constitution, and the need for an independent judiciary to protect all our rights. Something has gone awry in the highest court in the land. The Kohlberg Center, which will draw on the talent of today’s Brennan Center staff and enlist experts from around the country and across the political spectrum, will be part of our contribution to setting things right.