‘Midterm Monitor’ Captures U.S. Election Narratives on Social Media

Threats to demo­cracy. Polls show this is a top concern among voters
-A +A

Photos: YouTube

Wash­ing­ton, D.C. – The Alli­ance for Secur­ing Demo­cracy (ASD) at the German Marshall Fund of the United States and the Bren­nan Center for Justice at NYU Law Thursday launched the Midterm Monitor, an inter­act­ive tool designed to capture voting and elec­tion messaging from a select group of candid­ates, U.S. media, and foreign state-backed sources across multiple social media plat­forms. The monitor allows users to track elec­tion narrat­ives and better under­stand those messages.

Designed for academ­ics, elec­tion offi­cials, journ­al­ists, research­ers, and other inter­ested indi­vidu­als, the Midterm Monitor has been collect­ing data since early summer and already includes close to 40,000 posts related to voting and elec­tions. The tool lets users explore its data based on geography, source, plat­form, language, and more. The dash­board also offers a menu of filters for elec­tion-related search terms, such as “ballots,” “vote by mail,” and “elec­tion secur­ity,” to help users put together a fuller picture of the conver­sa­tion around voting and elec­tion admin­is­tra­tion.

MIDTERM MONITOR DETAILS: The Midterm Monitor collects posts and metrics from Face­book, Instagram, Twit­ter, and YouTube accounts affil­i­ated with candid­ates for the U.S. House, U.S. Senate, and candid­ates for governor and secret­ary of state. The monitor also collects posts and metrics from accounts affil­i­ated with influ­en­tial national media outlets and pundits, most-followed local media outlets in 10 battle­ground states, non-English language U.S. media outlets, Span­ish-language U.S. media outlets, and state media and diplo­mats asso­ci­ated with the Chinese, Iranian, and Russian govern­ments.

Read the full meth­od­o­logy here.


Analysts from ASD and the Bren­nan Center have been examin­ing and will continue to exam­ine emer­ging narrat­ives on several key topics this elec­tion season, such as elec­tion deni­al­ism, the Span­ish-language inform­a­tion space, and more. So far, analysts have learned the follow­ing:

Threats to demo­cracy. Polls show this is a top concern among voters, and initial data from the monitor indic­ates some agree­ment across party lines that demo­cracy is under threat, though the why and how may differ. Early monitor find­ings show that, between July 1 and Septem­ber 5, 2022, 196 tweets by U.S. polit­ical candid­ates mentioned vari­ations of the phrase “threat to demo­cracy.” More than a quarter were posted after Pres­id­ent Biden’s Septem­ber 1 speech on demo­cracy. Seventy-five percent (147 of the 196 tweets) were by Demo­cratic candid­ates.

Between July 1 and August 31, more than half of the 117 tweets from Demo­cratic candid­ates that mentioned vari­ations of the phrase “threat to demo­cracy” framed the source of the threat as the Repub­lican party, former pres­id­ent Trump, the candid­ates’ oppon­ents, or a combin­a­tion of the three. Of the 16 tweets by Repub­lican candid­ates in that time frame, seven focused on censor­ship of conser­vat­ives on social media or criti­cized the “liberal media.”

Voting and elec­tion admin­is­tra­tion. The laws, policies, and processes surround­ing voting have been the subject of unpre­ced­en­ted atten­tion since the 2020 elec­tion. Initial monitor data shows more than 600 tweets mention­ing voting laws, 270 tweets refer­en­cing voting machines, and more than 150 tweets about voter suppres­sion since August 1, 2022. Analysts will continue to track key terms in elec­tion admin­is­tra­tion across plat­forms, party, state, and specific races.

Foreign inter­fer­ence in elec­tions. In 2016 and 2020, we saw foreign state-backed actors like Russia and Iran seek to inter­fere in U.S. elec­tions through inform­a­tion oper­a­tions (among other tactics). While the U.S. govern­ment concluded that China considered it but decided not to inter­fere in the 2020 elec­tion, the intel­li­gence community has recently issued warn­ings of Chin­a’s campaigns to influ­ence U.S. state and local lead­ers.

Initial monitor data shows that claims by U.S. accounts of elec­tion meddling and inter­fer­ence have largely focused on domestic, not foreign, threats. In candid­ate tweets between July 1 and August 31, 2022, mention­ing the terms “meddle” or “meddling,” only one tweet mentioned a foreign adversary, and it claimed that the FBI and Face­book were more respons­ible for meddling in the 2020 elec­tion than Russia. In the same time period, the U.S. media accounts tracked on the monitor posted at least 29 tweets about steps taken by the U.S. govern­ment or private compan­ies to combat foreign inter­fer­ence. Of those tweets, there were at least six tweets by media accounts that mentioned a State Depart­ment reward for inform­a­tion about Russian inter­fer­ence in the midterms.

Also Check Out...

arrest of a former Chicago cop Dante Salinas for the 2020 killing of 19-year-old Marcellis Stinnet
Former Chicago Cop Charged In 2020
The Push Collection Boutique can be found at www.pushcollectionboutique.com
First Clothing Boutique Featuring
President Joe Biden said Thursday the full force of the federal government is ready to help Puerto Rico recover from the devasta
Biden To Puerto Rico: “We’re With
 decision to suspend Ime Udoka for the entire 2022-23 NBA season
Celtics Suspend Udoka For Entire
UN General Assembly 2022
Day 3 of General Assembly’s Annual
Let’s Talk STEM with Dr. Calvin Mackie podcast, Dr. Mackie discusses the importance of greater equity in STEM education
Dr. Calvin Mackie Discusses