Dr. Brooks Robinson\ Black Economics.org
Photos: YouTube Screenshots\Wikimedia Commons
This essay challenges our “thoughtless” use of “Africa” as the name of the “Motherland” from economic, historical, and psychological/neuroeconomic perspectives. Is this a key “sin” of omission that binds us?[1] Your patience is requested as we explore this topic methodically.
The scholarly works of economists are highly valued, in part, because of the methodologies they
employ when exploring topics/issues. It is common for submissions in the economics literature to
include summaries of historical literature that delineate developments back to the origin of the
topic/issue at hand. Relatedly, a popular American religious figure (shown above) has reminded us that it is only by going to the “root” of a problem that we can determine its true nature and identify methods for correcting the problem or eliminating the problem altogether.
In the case of White Supremacy and economic inequality, unfortunately, most analyses trace
concerns back to the most recent penetration of Europeans into the “African” sphere. There is
generally little-to-no mention of engagement between Europeans and “Africans” going back to
ancient times. We believe that many current concerns could be eliminated or resolved if Europeans
would simply exhibit truthful acknowledgement of the gifts of knowledge that they received from
the “African” Continent and of their theft of that not freely given.[2] Europeans should also come to
reject their denial that descendant People of the Continent carry in our “race consciousness”
(epidemiologically) that original knowledge and the power to produce it and more today. We
(“African” People) too are often guilty of this denial to our great disadvantage.
Note our use of double inverted commas around “Africa.” This is because, even in our youth, the
Black Power movement taught that “‘Africa’ was not the ‘true’ name of the Motherland.”
Foregoing an effort to chronicle the numerous explanations “out there” concerning the origin of
the name “Africa,” what we all know is that “Africa” has not always been the name used by
African People to identify the continent that includes their homelands. It is commonly believed
that “Africa” was assigned by outsiders.
Now pause to consider a few potent adages (without related attributions): “A good names is as
good as gold;” “words make people;” and “people often take on the character implicit in their
name.”
Also, we all know that conquerors and colonizers have a history of “claiming it” and then “naming
it.” We discuss this topic in a recent, short essay: “Name It and Claim It” that considers the
implications of doing so.
Finally, we consider the psychology or neuroeconomics of the intersection between the power of
dominators to control the dominated and name assignment. We all know that a key trick employed
by dominators is to ensure that the dominated remain oblivious to their domination and to be
feverishly occupied with ephemeral feel good experiences, and with no interest in awakening to
their reality. Dominators use overt and subliminal methods to achieve this objective. They are
intended to keep the dominated in compliant acquiescence—a state of submission.
One of the most important dominator techniques is to cause the dominated to accept assigned
names. The entire world knows that Africans comprehended this long ago. Roots, the famous
television movie series that shook up the world when broadcasted during the 1970s, reminded us
of this fact by including elongated scenes concerning Kunta Kinte’s refusal of the name “Toby”
that was assigned by the slave master. Unfortunately, for Black Americans (but as expected from
those who produced the movie and whose eternal intention is to dominate Black People of the
world), because of the unconscionable violence inflicted upon him, Kunta Kinte ultimately
conceded and accepted Toby. Such concessions create an entry point to the mind and control of it.
We now arrive at our primary concern. “Africans,” “Black People of the World,” and
“Afrodescendants” have all acquiesced to “Africa” as the name of our revered homeland. But to
accept “Africa” is to limit our power because the Africa that we know has been parameterized by
ones who assigned the name. And even after we explore ancient “African” history and culture and
come to comprehend the power of our antecedents “who discovered everything,” we diminish that
power because embedded deeply in our consciousness is the wedding of our knowledge about that
ancient world and knowledge about today’s nearly powerless “Africa”—a place named and shaped
by those with one goal: To dominate us forever.
As already mentioned, knowing that the “true” name for the Continent is not “Africa,” and
knowing that many nations on the Continent have recaptured their “true” historical names, we
asked one of the Western World’s gods (the all-knowing, all-seeing, and ubiquitous entity
Generative AI) the following question: “When did ‘African’ nations agree to accept ‘Africa’ as
the name to identify the Continent.” The god’s response was that nations on the continent have
not formally agreed to accept the name. Hence, we ask “African” nations: “Is this not a ‘sin’ of
omission?”
Knowing all the foregoing we ask: “Why do the nations and People of the Continent permit their
power to be diminished today and in the future by the negative impact of acceptance of ‘Africa’
as the name used to identify their womb, their birthplace, and their homeland?”
It is transparent that global change is occurring. Large and small nations alike are jockeying for
power positions. The nations of “Africa” are rarely mentioned, let alone the Continent’s vast
Diaspora population. Is it not time to begin releasing the power required to halt the destruction of
our Earth home, “African” People, and “African” descendants by a People bent on dominating
control, material wealth, and power over our world? Could rejection of the name “Africa” be an
important starting point for releasing such power?
Dr. Brooks Robinson is the founder of the Black Economics.org website.
End Notes
[1] The only recent scholarly contribution on this topic identified in our search is from Jonathan Chimakonam and Uti Egbai (2021). “Is ‘Africa’ a racial slur and should the continent be renamed?” African Identities: December, pp. 293-306. https://doi.org/10.1080/14725843.2021.2017262 (Ret. 021925).
[2] For clarification and elaboration please view: Prof. Na’im Akbar (circa 2000), “Na’im Akbar at McClymonds High School Nomo Lectures;” https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xVhD92ftFAg (Ret. 101224).
©B Robinson (021925); www.BlackEconomics.org
