ADVERTISEMENT

 

Breaking News | NY Watch | US News | Global Politics | BSN Money | Pundits Corner  | EntertainmentBlog  | Home

BSN Search

  Site  

August 30th, 2010

     
 
Obama Ups Troops To Afghans But Announce PullOut Date
Obama said the United States could not allow the Taliban and its partner, Al-Qaeda, to overthrow the weak government of Hamid Karzai. He noted that while the Karzai government is hampered by corruption and the drug trade, the alternative, a Taliban-controlled Afghanistan, would... Full Story

ADVERTISEMENT

 

Recent Comments

BSN does not necessarily support or endorse view points expressed throughout this site.

Date: May 27th, 2009
Name: B
Subject: No
Comment: It is a statistical fact that when guns are taken away from the populous (law abiding), gun crime increase drastically. England and Washington D.C. had this problem when they implemented their anti-gun policies.

If you want to reduce gun crimes you only need to increase gun crime punishments. Then we get to keep our guns, lives, and constitutional rights. Use some sense people.
 
Date: May 26th, 2009
Name: John Garasimowicz
Subject: gun control
Comment: I'm sorry, but I don't live in fear as you. I am legally registered to carry a pistol here in VA. Ironically, in central VA where I live I don't need to carry and seldom do, unless I'm called to an urban area and have to leave late at night. It is comforting to know if some gang banger tries to make me, or my family, his next trophy, I have the tool and the right to meet the threat on equal terms. I'm a 50 year old HS teacher, not some fatalist nutjob as you tend to portay us.
 
Date: May 25th, 2009
Name: andrew harrison
Subject: communist traitor
Comment: Screw you! and all the other traitors to the constitution with your line of thinking!
 
Date: May 25th, 2009
Name: CommenSense
Subject: Liberal Journalists are Anti-American
Comment: The person that wrote this article is an idiot. First of all, yes, there are 300 million guns in the U.S.. That makes the U.S. population the most well-armed army on the planet. Second, guns PREVENT more violent crimes every year than we could even imagine to calculate. And lastly... if you tried to prevent the sale, or take away guns to/from law-biding citizens, the criminals will still have their guns (let's face it, criminals don't follow laws anyway), and criminals will find it easier
 
Date: May 2nd, 2009
Name: Gavin M
Subject: guns and australia
Comment: People use guns because they're there. Amendment or not, if you own a gun your likey to use it. In Australia guns have been gone for years and its good. Now if you need to defend yourself you use your brain and your fists. Read the Art of War.
A true warrior can be victorious without having to draw his sword.
 
Date: April 30th, 2009
Name: Ted N.
Subject: Gun Violence; America Needs A Surge Like Iraq
Comment: This well-meaning editorial and the resulting, mostly oppositional comments provide a picture-perfect illustration of the problem with gun control vs. gun rights arguments. So much passion, so much vitriol! Everyone has statistics to prove their point. Unfortunately, the back-and-forth never seems to help the situation we should all care about - too many innocent people are being killed and maimed because of violence. Violence is the issue, not guns. If we can put our different opinions about
 
Date: April 30th, 2009
Name: Thorn
Subject: Outlaw Gun Control
Comment: This article is dangerous! It's dangerous in the sense that it instigates the passing of unconstitutional and compleately ineffective gun laws that only disarm law abiding citizens and fascillitate more muggings, rapes and murder. The Waco and Ruby Ridge Massacres by federal goons probably would never took place if it wasn't for hysterical articles like this. Instead of another gun law we need to outlaw any call to infringe on the rights protected by constitution. If it's illegal to call for
 
Date: April 28th, 2009
Name: Lthrnck
Subject: Anti-gun article
Comment: You know I always wonder why you never hear this from the mouths of Anti-Gun People like yourself...
There is no legal obligation for any law enforcement agency to protect the individual or their family.
Why is it you never hear from the Anti-Gun people like yourself...
Police response times are after you can get to the phone to call it in... does not include the time trying to get though on 911... that is of course if your even able to call 911.
 
Date: April 27th, 2009
Name: Chuck
Subject: Do you have a problem with acting out?
Comment: If all of us --whether here in the U.S. or in Iraq-- acted out every time we felt like killing someone and had a to do so.....we'd be well on our way to assured anihilation.
If you're making dinner, and your husband or wife says something which makes you angry are you driven to grab a knife and start stabbing them? What if you're at a resturant, and you overhear the obnoxious remarks of a nearby patron? If you're driving down the road, and someone cuts you off?

Editor's Note: With a gun often it's one shot; then it's too late to be sorry
 
Date: April 26th, 2009
Name: Jeronimo
Subject: Journalists Stop Misleading
Comment: These articles are criminal. You are a silly little propagandist puppet. Who will protect you should you be at the end of a criminals barrel. You'll be dead you Nazi! You don't believe in peace through superior firepower. The Supreme Court said police are under no obligation to provide protection to individuals. What bad journalism. Research shows thats state with tighter gun control laws suffer from higher rates of violent crime. Also look at many recently publicized acts of violence....

Editor's Note: Your virulent attacks give me the impression that if you were in front of me with a gun, you would probably shoot me.
 
Date: April 26th, 2009
Name: Jerry Jones
Subject: Speaking Truth To Empower.
Comment: Your article should have been titled, Speaking Lies to Enslave.
Your complete lack of historical knowledge, combined with willful ingnorance is breathtaking. Gun control is RACIST!
 
Date: April 26th, 2009
Name: Scott M
Subject: 2nd amendment
Comment: I think I am going to have to go with Bill, Mike, DJMoore and Peter. Aside from the racism, sexism and classism involved in your Utopian dreams you forget that the main point of the 14th amendment was to allow recently freed Blacks the right to keep and bear arms and the rest of the Bill of Rights. Why would you propose the same thing that the Klan did in the late 1800s? Why would you want to disarm the innocent 80 million who never commit a crime with their 270 some million firearms?
 
Date: April 26th, 2009
Name: Aaron
Subject: Gun control = thought control
Comment: I don't own a gun, but the more I hear about the debate, the more I side with the gun nuts. Looking at the disastrous historical consequences of disarmament, one cannot think that voluntary disarmament is a good idea (not without mountains of illogical fact fudging). If one were to suspend judgment and entertain both sides stoically, one would invariably conclude that disarmament is a bad idea. I guess the reason for not studying history is so that people can write articles such as yours....
 
Date: April 26th, 2009
Name: Bonnet
Subject: Handguns Can Prevent Violent Crimes
Comment: Anti-handgun argumentsAnti-handgun arguments focus on the danger to innocents. Because many innocent people, including children, are killed or injured by guns, it is the gun that is at fault and ought to be banished from existence.Anti-handgun arguments focus on the criminal deeds of gun toting felons to rob, maim, rape and kill innocents and it is the guns borne by those felons that are the cause of such criminal activity and if guns were legislated out of existence then these crimes would go away.Anti-handgun arguments focus on the suicides that occur every year caused by guns and those suicides are the direct fault of the gun and so if the guns went away then the suicide rate would fall dramatically and there would be no more handgun suicides.All the above arguments are invalid. If all guns were instantly gone, innocents would still be hurt and/or killed by autos, bats, bicycles, boats, chemicals, dark, drugs, glass, heights, knives, motorcycles, swords, tools, poisons, and yes, even water.Accidents, criminal activity and suicides are the reasons gun activists want to ban guns.Before there were any guns on earth, there were accidents crimes and suicides. Historical accounts abound. The Torah, Bible, Koran and Talmud recount such, as do myriads of other ancient documents.The anti-handguns argument degrades to become only guesses about what the results would be if all handguns disappeared.Guns are not going to go away. There are too many of them. Worldwide. If guns did go away, they would be swiftly created anew, and by the millions. Worldwide. By governments and in private factories. Stop trying to ban guns. It is a naive and fruitless endeavor.The argument that the Constitution applies only to Federal laws, and each State or locality can make any laws they wish regarding the right to keep and bear arms, is foolish. It takes away the rights of the people of this country and makes each State or locality a Country unto itself. We fought the Revolutionary and Civil Wars over such rights.Think about this: many violent crimes are or could be PREVENTED by handguns in the hands of good people. Ask those who have done so. Ask victims if they wished there had been a gun to protect them.



Editor's Note: On the whole society would be better off without the proliferation of weapons. If all of us --whether here in the U.S. or in Iraq-- acted out every time we felt like killing someone and had a handgun to do so.....we'd be well on our way to assured anihilation. If we don't act, we'll approach that path.
 
Date: April 26th, 2009
Name: Peter
Subject: Gimme a gun! Speaking Truth to Empower
Comment: A Black Man with a gun is....
Equal.
One hundred and sixty years ago, Black folk lived on plantations and were kept under the thumb of their so-called betters. Part of that was being disarmed.
Today, Black folk live in projects and inner-city neighborhoods and are kept under the thumb of their so-called betters. You're still disarmed.
Do you really think that you're better off now than you were then?
A Black man with a gun is Equal. Never forget that!
 
Date: April 26th, 2009
Name: Mike Vanderboegh
Subject: Stop spitting on the memory of the Deacons for Defense and Justice.
Comment: What sort of moron forgets the essential lessons of the history of his people within one generation? Answer: liberal American Jews and liberal African-Americans. Do you really think that the Holocaust would have been stopped by more disarmament on the part of European Jews? Do you really think that the Deacons for Defense and Justice could have faced off the Klan and the racist local and state law enforcement that they controlled with frigging tulips in their hands singing Kum-by-yah?
 
Date: April 26th, 2009
Name: djmoore
Subject: Moral Surge
Comment: The surge in Iraq was, in effect, all about putting guns in the hands of the good guys, and letting them pursue the wicked and defend the helpless.
Why then are you calling for guns to be taken from the hands of the good guys, We The People, ordinary, decent, law abiding American citizens, while letting the wicked run rampant? Where and when have criminals ever obeyed the law, however draconian?
Why are you, and Bob Herbert, claiming that we are handing out high-powered weaponry?


Editor's Note: The problem is you can'ty look into somebody's eyes --despite what Bush says-- and determine whether it's a "good guy" or not
 
Date: April 26th, 2009
Name: Bill
Subject: gun control
Comment: I firmly believe that the people who propose gun control support and abet criminal activity. What better way to make the life of crime and assault easier and more comfortable than to make sure you will not encounter an armed citizen unwilling to be a weak victim. Gun control is good for criminal safety during the execution of a crime. You do not have to worry about the homeowner, the owner of the car you want to jack, or the mini-mart you want to rob if non of them can own a gun!
 

 
 ADVERTISEMENT

Gun Violence; America Needs A Surge Like Iraq

Black Star News Editorial

April 25th, 2009

 
 
 
Hand guns; America's weapons of mass destruction and madness
     
   
 
1.5 / 5 (138 Votes)
 
 

[Black Star News Editorial]

This is a strange nation.

We celebrate the fact that the monthly death rate of American servicemen and women in Iraq has been dramatically curtailed since the launch of the U.S. "surge" or troops build-up in that still chaotic country struggling to recover from the destruction of the George W. Bush invasion.

Yet, we stand around helplessly as gun violence continues to claim thousands of American lives right here at home each year.

The United States needs a surge in moral outrage and action more than Iraq and Afghanistan ever did.

Look at the recent killings in Binghamton, New York, on April 4. Vietnamese immigrant, Jiverly Wong, tired of years of taunting over his accent, instead of pummeling the next person to taunt him, murders 13 people in a moment of rage and possible insanity.

More than 12,000 Americans meet their death through gun violence each year. That’s more than 1,000 a month.

In November 2006, before the U.S. surge in Iraq, about 3,475 Iraqis died in sectarian violence; 69 Americans were killed. After the surge, by November 2008, American deaths had been reduced to 12 and 500 Iraqis died. Here in the U.S., we’re losing more than double the death rate of Iraqis to our own gun madness.

There are a reported 283 million privately owned guns in this country.

Despite the mayhem the guns are causing, Americans have a laissez-faire attitude over the need for gun control; we want to prevent Iran and North Korea from acquiring weapons of mass destruction, yet we don’t mind that hand guns are causing mass destruction in our own country.

As Bob Herbert wrote in a New York Times column today, "We’re confiscating shampoo from carry-on luggage at airports while at the same time handing out high-powered weaponry to criminals and psychotics at gun shows."

(As Herbert also pointed out, "while more than 12,000 people are murdered with guns annually, the Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence using the latest available data tells us that more than 30,000 people are killed over the course of one typical year by guns. That includes 17,000 who commit suicide, nearly 800 who are killed in accidental shootings and more than 300 killed by the police. In many of the law enforcement shootings, the police officers are reacting to people armed with guns").

Tens of thousands more are wounded with guns but don’t die.

Why do we tolerate this madness on the spurious claim that the right to bear arms –even by nuts and sadistic killers—is protected by the Constitution? We doubt very highly that the nation’s forefathers intended handguns to be in the hands of pretty much anyone that wanted it.

Notwithstanding the condemnable racist attitude and compromise that assigned Black people as three-fifths human beings, on the whole these were wise men that wrote the Constitution. Does any rational person really believe that these men envisioned and wanted the mayhem now caused by weapons proliferation? Only the most hardened criminal inmates would promote such an outcome.

What kind of tyranny is the mass availability of hand guns protecting the American public from? In fact, hand guns proliferation is creating a pervasive fear; a new kind of tyranny in of itself.

During the era of the Cold War, the stalemate that evolved once both the United States and Soviet Russia attained enough nuclear warheads to be able to obliterate each side was known as "Mutually Assured Destruction" (MAD) and it helped preserve the peace.

Yet, a different kind of mutually assured destruction has now found root in the United States—the mass availability of hand guns, and the very high propensity to use them, will surely lead to our mutual destruction.

So why do we tolerate this madness? Why don’t we want a surge that will remove hands guns in the hands of killers and mad people? Why celebrate the effectiveness of our surge in Iraq and yet tolerate killings on our own streets?

Gun nuts and the National Rifle Association (NRA), the powerful, well-oiled lobbying group continue to advocate mass guns availability using phrases such as "guns don’t kill; people do."

Guns actually make it easier for people to kill; so, guns in effect do kill.

All a demented person –or even a "sane" ordinary person—in a minute of rage, instead of resorting to their fists to dissipate rage, can quickly acquire a gun and act out that moment of excitability and take out a life.

Children can plot the demise of their parents; spurned lovers can plot the killing of the person who has caused heartache; depressed individuals, or those despondent after losing a job, can wipe out their own family; and, angry or confused students can take out entire classrooms.

All these murders can be easily committed due to the easy availability of guns in this country.

Things are getting out of control.

America needs a surge to beat back the tyranny of gun violence.




Please post your comments online or submit them to milton@blackstarnews.com

"Speaking Truth To Empower."


 
Rate this article
1.5 / 5 (138 Votes)
 
Go ahead and leave a scream below!
 
Your name:
Your email:
Subject:
Your Comment:


 
 
 

ADVERTISEMENT

 

 

BSN ARCHIVES

Now you can see articles and stories from previous days or months.

Dec 2009
SMTWTFS
    1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31    
 

ADVERTISEMENT

.

Breaking News | NY Watch | US News | Global Politics | BSN Money | Pundits Corner Entertainment  | AdvertiseHome

Contact Us | About Us  |  Media Kit  |  Subscribe to BSN

.

ADVERTISEMENT

© 2008 Black Star News Inc. All Rights Reserved. Terms and Privacy under which this service is provided to you.

Proudly Powered by: ion360