|
|
|
|
|
Recent Comments
BSN does not necessarily support or endorse view points expressed throughout this site. |
|
Date: May 25th, 2008
Name: geoff
Subject: clinton lies
Comment: What new information? The Republican's have been stating this for at least 16 years but do African American's listen to Republican's? No -- why not?
|
Date: April 8th, 2008
Name: Tab
Subject: lies, etc
Comment: Obama's lie was about something he was not old enough to have had any first-hand information about - it may have been a family yarn. However, Hillary's was direct experience as an adult. If you think McCain does not lie, well you are in for a huge let down. Not only does he lie, he does not know what he is talking about most of the time - does not know the difference between Sunni and Shia, and would be a disaster worse than Bush as a president.
|
Date: April 7th, 2008
Name: lyn
Subject: clinton lies
Comment: Can anyone explain why the mainstream media isn't picking this story up? It broke on the 25th of march, but nary a word on cnn, msnbc or foxnews. I really thought fox would be running with it. but, nada, nothing. The closest I've seen/heard is Limbaugh dancing with it. A Dem friend said it is probably because they Repubs don't want to reconnect with Nixon. BTW, Nixon's grandson is a campaign manager for MCcain in NY state. And all of the politicians lie....
|
Date: April 6th, 2008
Name: George Smith
Subject: Clinton Lies Unravel Legacy
Comment: It takes you more than 16 years to come to terms with this issue??? Talk about drinking the Kool-Aid. Clinton's legacy is going to be that of a dishonest, impeached snake oil salesman. The good economy during his term will be seen as a fortunate coincidence for him. When the Clintonrs were the hottest game in town, the mass media either choked down their distaste, or were so in the tank they gave the Clintons every pass in the world.
|
Date: April 6th, 2008
Name: Leem Gill Brantley
Subject: Clinton Defeats Herself
Comment: I said back in Spring of 2007 that the only way to defeat Hilliary was for her to defeat herself. That her arrogance and her own actions and words were the only thing that could bring her down. My associates are now treating me like an Oracle.. But it was so simple, really. And it couldn't happen to a more deserving couple.
|
Date: April 6th, 2008
Name: Iris
Subject: Hillary's moves
Comment: Perhaps Hillary has lost firm contact with solid truth, for she is so busy moving the goal post, shifting the blame, and spinning in flipping directions. Her aim is to make us so dizzy we don't notice she's stretching the truth. Good thing they had video in Bosnia.
|
Date: April 6th, 2008
Name: Caleb
Subject: Obama lies
Comment: I am a lifelong Democrat, but the lies told by both Clinton and Obama this go-around will have me voting for McCain this year. Clinton gets called out on her lies much more often than Obama, but they are running neck and neck in the amount of lies told. Obama claimed that the Kennedy Administration paid for his father to fly to America where he then met Obama's mother. Only problem is that the flights from Kenya didn't start until Obama was 3 1/2 years old. Once again the rock star gets off easy.
|
Date: April 6th, 2008
Name: kalyan
Subject: Bringing good governance to People
Comment: Unraveling the lies and spins of Ms.Clinton, the epitome of self-centered politician means also helping bring good governance back to people. Greed and self-interest has always been the motive of Ms.Clinton. But the issue is how to unravel it and make people realize the truth in the face of constant spins. This article will go that much more to bring the sense of reality. Thanks
|
Date: April 6th, 2008
Name: Michael Coyne
Subject: Thank you for getting it right
Comment: This article finally brings out what I and other Americans have felt but did not have the venue to express it to a mass audience. I have never trusted the Clintons nor did I ever feel that they had all Americans interests above their own. While you mention the Balkan war during the 1990's I also felt that the Clintons failed to act to help the Rwandans during the genocide. While talking so much about experience she has never shown nor demonstrated any true leadership capabilities. Thanks
|
Date: April 6th, 2008
Name: joe h.
Subject: Clinton Lies Unravel Legacy
Comment: The full text of Zeifman's report about Hillary's unethical behavior seems to indicate that she did so at the direction of her immedicate supervisor's. Your headline should read Young Attorney Follows Superiors' Orders and Gets Fired. Hardly news--this article bends the truth in an effort to destroy an individual's reputation. Makes me glad I do not read BSN on a regular basis. Nor would I recommend anyone doing so.
|
Date: April 6th, 2008
Name: Clinton's Lies
Subject: commentary
Comment: Well said. Enough said.
|
|
| |
|
|
ADVERTISEMENT
|
|
Clinton Lies Unravel Legacy |
|
By Eric L. Wattree
April 6th, 2008
|
| |
| |
 |
| |
Senator Clinton; one lie after the other is exposed |
|
|
|
 |
|
| |
[Election 2008: Commentary]
Hillary Clinton's ravenous ambition and sense of entitlement has clearly blinded her to reality. If she wasn't so blinded by the arrogance of believing that America owes her the presidency, she'd realize that her antics in this election is not only undermining any chance she has of becoming president, but it's also wreaking havoc on the Clinton legacy. The one thing the Clintons had going for them was America's belief that, with all their flaws, they were primarily motivated by what was in America's best interest.
But that's no longer the case. Now we see the Clintons for what they are–a couple who's willing to lie, cheat and steal to promote their own greed and self-interest. That, in turn, has caused many Americans to take a second look at both, their character, and Bill's presidency through the lense of this new information, and a large number of them don't like what they see.
Now, many Americans are beginning to ask themselves questions, like how can we trust Hillary to answer that call at 3 a.m. When she seems to be totally oblivious to facts that are staring her in the face–especially when those facts don't conform to what she wants to see? For example, doesn't she realize that by continuously slinging mud at Obama instead of addressing the issues that it's making her look desperate and less than concerned about the fate of the Democratic Party? And what about her judgment? What could she have possibly been thinking when she repeatedly endorsed the Republican nominee over Obama? Then there was the Bosnian matter.
Didn't she realize before she told that blatant lie about the Bosnian trip that there were news cameras there to document that she was lying? And if that wasn't stupid enough, she then went on The Tonight Show and tried to joke about it, as though lying to the American people was all in fun. Now, as a direct result of that lie, a Pew research survey indicates that 29% of Democrats asked describes Hillary as phony. In addition, she's also placed herself in a position where every syllable she utters, and every scrap of paper she releases is going to be scrutinized with a fine tooth comb--and that doesn't bode well, considering her dubious past.
As a matter of fact, it seems that the process has already begun. Dan Calabrese reveals in his column that former general counsel and chief of staff of the House Judiciary Committee, Jerry Zeifman, indicated that he fired the 27 year old Hillary Rodham from the House Judiciary Committee staff and refused to give her a letter of recommendation due to her lying and unethical conduct. Zeifman said that during the Watergate investigation Hillary lied in a legal brief, them removed evidence from public access that would document her conduct.
In addition, Christopher Hitchens wrote in an article for Slate Magazine that Hillary's lie about flying into Bosnia under sniper fire was just the tip of the iceberg in the Bosnian story. Hitchens points out that while Hillary arrived in Tuzla in 1996, the real story began four years earlier in 1992 when Bill Clinton promised to take action to prevent the ethnic cleansing of Bosnia. Hitchens points to Sally Bedell Smith's book, For Love of Politics, where she indicates the following:
"Taking the advice of Al Gore and National Security Advisor Tony Lake, Bill agreed to a proposal to bomb Serbian military positions while helping the Muslims acquire weapons to defend themselves—the fulfillment of a pledge he had made during the 1992 campaign. But instead of pushing European leaders, he directed Secretary of State Warren Christopher merely to consult with them. When they balked at the plan, Bill quickly retreated, creating a 'perception of drift.' The key factor in Bill's policy reversal was Hillary, who was said to have 'deep misgivings' and viewed the situation as 'a Vietnam that would compromise health-care reform.' The United States took no further action in Bosnia, and the 'ethnic cleansing' by the Serbs was to continue for four more years, resulting in the deaths of more than 250,000 people."
Revelations such as the ones above, along with the truth about NAFTA, and the Clinton antics during this campaign is rapidly changing America's view of the Clintons-- including Bill's legacy as president. Regardless to what one's position is on the matter of universal healthcare, allowing the death of 250,000 people is much too high a price to pay to promote any legislation–and especially when that legislation ultimately went down to defeat.
But at this point, one must wonder about Hillary's commitment to universal healthcare in the first place. Now that we've seen the several faces of Hillary, along with the Clinton's Machiavellian approach to politics, one is tempted to wonder if Hillary was really as committed to universal healthcare as she claimed, or was she simply building a resume for this future run for the presidency. Her commitment seems especially suspect now, since it has recently been revealed that she failed to pay the healthcare premiums for her own campaign staff.
According to Politico.com , Hillary has failed to pay $292,000 in healthcare premiums for her own staff. And what makes this episode even more ironic is the fact that Hillary's failure to pay those premiums reinforces a point that Obama has repeatedly made during the campaign. Hillary claimed that Obama's plan was flawed because it didn't cover all of the people. In response, Obama said that his plan covered anyone who wanted to be insured, but he didn't make it mandatory that every adult be insured because under Hillary's plan if a person couldn't afford to pay the premium they'd be fined for missing the payment, which would create an additional financial burden on many people. Now maybe Hillary will understand Obama's point. If Hillary's campaign staff had been insured under her plan, in addition to having to pay the $292,000 in back premiums, she'd also be facing a fine.
It's sad to watch the Clintons go down in flames. I would have been quite comfortable with having Bill step into history as one of our great presidents, and to see Hillary live out an illustrious political career, whatever that entailed. But in the end, it's beginning to look like it is the intent of destiny to set the record straight. What we now know about the Clinton's ugly greed for power has brought additional scrutiny into their lives, and at this point, it looks like it's going to be their undoing. While it's painful knowing that I was wrong about them, I'd much rather to be informed than to be right.
(wattree.blogspot.com)
To comment, to subscribe to or advertise in New York’s leading Pan African weekly investigative newspaper, please call (212) 481-7745 or send a note to Milton@blackstarnews.com
Also visit out sister publications Harlem Business News www.harlembusinessnews.com publications and The Groove Music magazine www.thegroovemag.com
"Speaking Truth To Power."
|
| |
| Rate this article |
| |
| Go ahead and leave a scream below! |
| |
| |
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
BSN ARCHIVES |
|
Now you can see articles and stories from previous days or months. |
|
|
|
|
|
|